Abstract

Skeletal muscle, heart muscle, and smooth muscle differ with respect to morphology, function, and Ca metabolism. For the actual coupling between excitation and contraction, three different sources of Ca2+ supply are conceivable: release from intracellular organelles, release from plasmalemmal binding sites, and transmembranous influx. Considerable experimental evidence favors the membranes of the sarcoplasmic reticulum as the source of coupling Ca2+ in skeletal muscle, whereas in cardiac and smooth muscles the Ca store from which coupling Ca2+ is released has to be in intimate contact with the extracellular Ca2+ concentration. In order to distinguish between the two remaining possibilities for the source of coupling Ca2+, i.e., transmembranous Ca influx and Ca release from the plasmalemma, Ca antagonist--widely accepted tools for detecting Ca influx--were used. Ca antagonists did not have any influence on Ca exchange or Ca uptake either in cardiac or in smooth muscles. These findings may be interpreted as follows: Ca antagonists do not act by inhibiting the Ca2+ influx, although they reduce the amount of coupling Ca2+. This conclusion conflicts with current ideas concerning the mode of action of Ca antagonists. We feel, however, that the experimental support for the Ca-channel hypothesis is rather vague. This leads us to favor the plasmalemma as the main source of coupling Ca2+ in cardiac and smooth muscles.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.