Abstract

Background: Calcium activated Cl− current (ICl(Ca)) mediated by TMEM16A and/or Bestrophin-3 may contribute to cardiac arrhythmias. The true profile of ICl(Ca) during an actual ventricular action potential (AP), however, is poorly understood. Our goal was to study the current profile under normal calcium cycling and AP voltage-clamp condition as well as in case of altered intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i). The expression of TMEM16A and/or Bestrophin-3 in canine and human left ventricular myocytes was examined. The possible spatial distribution of these proteins and their co-localization with Cav1.2 was also studied.Methods: Whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique and action potential voltage-clamp were used to monitor ICl(Ca), detected as 9-anthracene carboxylic acid (9-AC)-sensitive current. FURA-2-AM dye was used to measure [Ca2+]i. Expression and cellular localization of Cav1.2, Bestrophin-3 and TMEM16A was analyzed with immunocytochemistry and confocal microscopy.Results: Under AP voltage-clamp conditions the profile of ICl(Ca) contained an early fast outward (1.62±0.06 A/F) and a late inward component (−0.16±0.02 A/F), overlapping early and terminal repolarizations, respectively. Both components were reduced by ryanodine (1.05±0.03 A/F; −0.07±0.03 A/F), while fully abolished by BAPTA (0.13±0.10 A/F; −0.08±0.02 A/F), but not EGTA (1.17±0.09 A/F; −0.13±0.02 A/F). Setting [Ca2+]i to the systolic level (1.1 µM) decreased ICl(Ca), while application of Bay K8644, isoproterenol, and faster stimulation rates increased the amplitude of ICl(Ca). Both L-type Ca2+ current and ICl(Ca) were eliminated by nisoldipine. TMEM16A and Bestrophin-3 showed strong co-localization with one another and also with Cav1.2 channels both canine myocytes and human ventricular myocardium.Conclusions: Activation of ICl(Ca) in canine ventricular cells requires calcium entry through neighboring L-type Ca2+ channels and is only augmented by SR Ca2+-release. Substantial activation of ICl(Ca) requires high Ca2+ in the dyadic clefts which can be effectively buffered by BAPTA, but not EGTA.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call