Abstract

Skeletons of the scleractinian coral Porites are widely utilized as archives of geochemical proxies for, among other things, sea surface temperature in paleoclimate studies. Here, we document live-collected Porites lobata specimens wherein as much as 60% of the most recently deposited skeletal aragonite, i.e., the part of the skeleton that projects into the layer of living polyps and thus is still in direct contact with living coral tissue, has been bored and replaced by calcite cement. Calcite and aragonite were identified in situ using Raman microspectroscopy. The boring-filling calcite cement has significantly different trace element ratios (Sr/Ca (mmol/mol) = 6.3 ± 1.4; Mg/Ca (mmol/mol) = 12.0 ± 5.1) than the host coral skeletal aragonite (Sr/Ca (mmol/mol) = 9.9 ± 1.3; Mg/Ca (mmol/mol) = 4.5 ± 2.3). The borings appear to have been excavated by a coccoid cyanobacterium that dissolved aragonite at one end and induced calcite precipitation at the other end as it migrated through the coral skeleton. Boring activity and cement precipitation occurred concomitantly with coral skeleton growth, thus replacing skeletal aragonite that was only days to weeks old in some cases. Although the cement-filled borings were observed in only ∼20% of sampled corals, their occurrence in some of the most recently produced coral skeleton suggests that any corallum could contain such cements, irrespective of the coral’s subsequent diagenetic history. In other words, pristine skeletal aragonite was not preserved in parts of some corals for even a few weeks. Although not well documented in coral skeletons, microbes that concomitantly excavate carbonate while inducing cement precipitation in their borings may be common in the ubiquitous communities that carry out micritization of carbonate grains in shallow carbonate settings. Thus, such phenomena may be widespread, and failure to recognize even very small quantities of early cement-filled borings in corals used for paleoclimate studies could compromise high resolution paleotemperature reconstructions. The inability to predict the occurrence of cement-filled borings in coralla combined with the difficulty in recognizing them on polished blocks highlights the great care that must be taken in vetting samples both for bulk and microanalysis of geochemistry.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call