Abstract

In June 2011, the SGO recommended that physical exam and symptoms be the primary surveillance methods in patients with endometrial cancer. We sought to evaluate adherence to these guidelines by comparing the use of CT scans, paps and serum CA125 ordered for endometrial cancer surveillance before and after publication of these guidelines.A retrospective review was performed for all patients undergoing surveillance for endometrial cancer at a single institution between June 2009 and June 2013. We assessed the number of patients without symptoms or abnormal physical exam findings who underwent surveillance CT scans, paps and/or CA125 during the 2 years pre- and 2 years post-SGO guidelines.92 patients (n = 48 pre-6/2011, n = 44 post-6/2011) were identified. Mean patient age was 58 years. No significant difference in age, ethnicity, body mass index, or disease grade or stage was noted. There was a significant decline in surveillance CT scans (n = 13, 27% vs. n = 4, 9%, p = 0.03), CA125 (n = 14, 29% vs. 5, 11%, p = 0.035) and paps (n = 34, 71% vs. n = 8 vs. 18%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in disease status at the last follow-up. Institutional cost of surveillance also declined ($14,102.46 2 years pre-guidelines, $3,054.99 2 years post-guidelines).In a single urban academic public hospital, after only 2 years, clinical adherence to the 2011 SGO endometrial cancer surveillance guidelines resulted in a significant decline in the use of CT scans, CA125 and paps. This reduction does not appear to affect patient outcomes and led to an appreciable decrease in surveillance costs.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call