Abstract
Vitamin D deficiency is the main cause of nutritional rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults. There is consensus that nutritional access to vitamin D can be estimated by measuring serum concentrations of 25OHD and vitamin D deficiency can thus be considered as calcifediol deficiency. However, the threshold for vitamin D/calcifediol sufficiency remains a matter of debate. Vitamin D/calcifediol deficiency has been associated with musculoskeletal effects but also multiple adverse extra-skeletal consequences. If these consequences improve or if they can be treated with vitamin D supplementation is still unclear. Observational studies suggest a higher infection risk in people with low calcifediol levels. There is also a consistent association between serum calcifediol and cardiovascular events and deaths, but large-scale, long-term intervention studies did not show any benefit on cardiovascular outcomes from supplementation, at least not in subjects without clear vitamin D deficiency. Cancer risk also did not change with vitamin D treatment, although there are some data that higher serum calcifediol is associated with longer survival in cancer patients. In pregnant women, vitamin D supplementation decreases the risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, and low birth weight. Although preclinical studies showed that the vitamin D endocrine system plays a role in certain neural cells as well as brain structure and function, there is no evidence to support a beneficial effect of vitamin D in neurodegenerative diseases. Vitamin D supplementation may marginally affect overall mortality risk especially in elderly subjects with low serum calcifediol concentrations.
Highlights
Vitamin D was discovered a century ago and it has been a topic of intensive basic research and more lately of hundreds of clinical studies, all exploring the consequences of vitamin D status on bone and extra-skeletal health
Human intervention studies suggest a causal link between vitamin D/calcifediol status and infections, whereas Mendelian randomization (MR) studies strongly suggest a link between lifelong lower calcifediol levels and the risk of multiple sclerosis
Most human vitamin D comes from this kind of synthesis in the skin, whereas a small fraction comes from dietary intake
Summary
Vitamin D was discovered a century ago and it has been a topic of intensive basic research and more lately of hundreds of clinical studies, all exploring the consequences of vitamin D status on bone and extra-skeletal health. The lay press has paid intensive attention to these questions and it has even generated a real hype about the possible benefits of more widespread vitamin D supplementation. Should we relabel what we up till usually described as “vitamin D deficiency”. What are the clinical consequences of such “calcifediol deficiency”? Should we taper down the hype while avoiding minimizing the consequences of “vitamin What are the clinical consequences of such “calcifediol deficiency”? Should we taper down the hype while avoiding minimizing the consequences of “vitamin
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.