Abstract
Calcarenite is described as sand-size particles that are cemented together by carbonates, therefore it should be modeled as a poroelastic medium. Elastic and poroelastic models of calcarenite are compared. The poroelastic models include the baseline Biot model and the Biot-Stoll with contact squirt flow and viscous shear drag (BICSQS) model. Input parameters for the poroelastic models are developed. Reflection loss as a function of frequency and angle is computed. Model predictions of shallow water propagation loss over a calcarenite seabed are compared. Differences in propagation loss predictions are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
