Calcaneal Bone Biopsy Inconsistency between Specimens Obtained From Trephine and Fine Needle Biopsy Techniques

Abstract

Standardized methods for osteomyelitis (OM) diagnosis of the lower extremity have proven to be difficult. Preoperative probability of foot osteomyelitis necessitates a combination of clinical, laboratory, imaging evidence (i.e., X-ray, CT, MRI), and bone biopsy to guide diagnosis and treatment. In the recent past, the relative weight that clinicians give to these collections of data to advise potential surgical intervention has been challenged, particularly with histologic evaluation of bone biopsy—traditionally considered “gold standard” in OM diagnosis. This study seeks to further expand this dialogue by retrospectively comparing calcaneal bone biopsies performed by direct visualization trephine approach (performed by Surgeons) vs fine needle biopsy with fluoroscopy guidance (performed by Interventional Radiologists). Results obtained from 57 patients with suspected calcaneal osteomyelitis demonstrate that Trephine obtained samples are significantly more likely to produce histopathologic evidence of OM (p-value: .013), microbiologic evidence of OM (p-value: <.001) and have better histopathologic and microbiologic concordance (p-value: <.001) than calcaneal bone biopsies obtained from Fine Needle Biopsy with fluoroscopy guidance.