Abstract
ABSTRACT The narratives of the reign of the last Amorian emperor, Michael III (r. 842–867), and the government of his uncle, Caesar Bardas (r. 856–866), were mostly authored by hostile Macedonian chroniclers living a century or so following the events they describe. This fact poses considerable difficulties for the historiographical assessment of this period. Recently brought to scholarly attention, a Shīʿī Arabic account has been presented in previous scholarship as a counter-narrative to Byzantine historians’ portrayal of the period of interest. The present study sets out to, first, re-appraise, in the light of fresh historical testimonies, the extent of Byzantine records’ affinities with this “ignored Arabic account” and second, to gauge whether this Arabic evidence can be an aid in filling the historiographical lacuna created by the Byzantine chroniclers’ and hagiographers’ one-sided depiction of the late Amorian period. The latter aim will be pursued via analysis of the rival representations of a traumatic event which happened during Bardas’s rule, namely the earthquake of Constantinople.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.