Abstract
AbstractAlthough specimen smectities (e.g., SWy‐1) are often used as analogues of the exchanger phase in smectitic soils, few comparisons of metal ion sorption on specimen and soil smectites have been made. In this study, the sorption of Cd was measured on SWy‐1 and on clay‐sized separates from two smectitic subsoils to evaluate the selectivity of specimen and soil‐derived smectites for Cd. Sorption was measured in clay suspensions (≈1 mmolc L−1 equivalent charge concentration at pH 6.0) in Na+, Ca2+, and Na+‐Ca2+ perchlorate solutions across pH 4.5 to 8.5 and at ionic strengths (I) ranging from 0.005 to 0.1. Ionic strength and electrolyte cation valence strongly influenced Cd sorption by SWy‐1 and the soil smectites. Ion exchange dominated Cd sorption at low ionic strength in Na+ electrolyte (I = 0.005–0.014). Increasing Na+ concentrations to I = 0.1 or changing the electrolyte cation to Ca2+ at I = 0.003 to 0.006 suppressed ion exchange. When ion exchange was suppressed, Cd sorption to both specimen and soil smectites showed little dependence on ionic strength and increased with pH. Except at the lowest Na+ concentration (I = 0.005), conditional equilibrium constants (Kv) for Cd2+ exchange increased with increases in both ionic strength and pH. These increases were ascribed to Cd complexation reactions to edge sites on the layer silicates whose effects became evident only under conditions that suppressed ion exchange. At pH 6 and I = 0.05–0.01, SWy‐1 did not exhibit any preference for Na+, Ca2+, or Cd2+. The smectitic soil separates, in contrast, showed (i) sorption behavior that increased sharply with pH, (ii) preference for Cd in Na+ and Ca2+ electrolytes, and (iii) variation in Kv with ionic strength, pH, and surface coverage. The contrasting sorption behavior of the soil smectites was hypothesized to result from (i) a greater edge surface area, which increased the contribution of oxidelike complexation reactions to Cd sorption, and (ii) the presence of minor associated organic material and Fe oxides that functioned as co‐complexants for Cd.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.