Abstract

BackgroundSplicing of genomic exons into mRNAs is a critical prerequisite for the accurate synthesis of human proteins. Genetic variants impacting splicing underlie a substantial proportion of genetic disease, but are challenging to identify beyond those occurring at donor and acceptor dinucleotides. To address this, various methods aim to predict variant effects on splicing. Recently, deep neural networks (DNNs) have been shown to achieve better results in predicting splice variants than other strategies.MethodsIt has been unclear how best to integrate such process-specific scores into genome-wide variant effect predictors. Here, we use a recently published experimental data set to compare several machine learning methods that score variant effects on splicing. We integrate the best of those approaches into general variant effect prediction models and observe the effect on classification of known pathogenic variants.ResultsWe integrate two specialized splicing scores into CADD (Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion; cadd.gs.washington.edu), a widely used tool for genome-wide variant effect prediction that we previously developed to weight and integrate diverse collections of genomic annotations. With this new model, CADD-Splice, we show that inclusion of splicing DNN effect scores substantially improves predictions across multiple variant categories, without compromising overall performance.ConclusionsWhile splice effect scores show superior performance on splice variants, specialized predictors cannot compete with other variant scores in general variant interpretation, as the latter account for nonsense and missense effects that do not alter splicing. Although only shown here for splice scores, we believe that the applied approach will generalize to other specific molecular processes, providing a path for the further improvement of genome-wide variant effect prediction.

Highlights

  • Splicing of genomic exons into mRNAs is a critical prerequisite for the accurate synthesis of human proteins

  • Sequence-based models perform best for splice effect prediction Using the MFASS data set split into splice-disrupting variants and not-disrupting variants, we compared the performance of several recent splicing effect predictors and a selection of species conservation measures (Fig. 2a, Additional file 1: Fig. S1)

  • We discovered that the original MFASS publication [26] inverted some scores such as PhyloP and PhastCons and that, when corrected, those scores perform better than random guessing on predicting splice effects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Splicing of genomic exons into mRNAs is a critical prerequisite for the accurate synthesis of human proteins. While some predictors specialize on certain variant categories (e.g., synonymous [12] or missense effects [13, 14]) or classes (e.g., SNVs [15] or InDels [16, 17]), others take features from different biological processes into account and enable variant interpretation across the genome. Both process-specific and genome-wide approaches to variant effect prediction have distinct advantages, and it has been challenging to reconcile them into a maximally effective approach

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call