CAD-CAM glass fiber compared with conventional prefabricated glass fiber posts: A systematic review

Abstract

Statement of problemA prefabricated glass fiber post provides esthetic and biomechanical benefits for severely damaged endodontically treated teeth; however, failures in post retention remain a challenge. PurposeThe purpose of this systematic review was to compare the fracture resistance and bond strength of prefabricated glass fiber posts to those made with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM). Material and methodsThis review was entered into PROSPERO (CRD42020213668) and was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic systematic searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were conducted for published articles until October 2020. Studies that compared prefabricated glass fiber posts with CAD-CAM-fabricated glass fiber posts were selected, and studies that had not been published in English or in the previous 10 years were excluded. The fracture resistance (N) and bond strength (MPa) were the primary outcomes. ResultsAfter reviewing the title, abstract, and the entire text of 227 articles, 8 studies were selected. Four studies were omitted. Four of the 8 studies were retained for qualitative analyses, with 1 having a high risk of bias and 3 having a medium risk of bias. Only 1 study found significantly higher fracture resistance in the CAD-CAM group than in the prefabricated group. The bond strength study reported a significant difference, with the CAD-CAM group having greater bond strength than the prefabricated group. ConclusionsDespite the high heterogeneity and the few included articles, a tendency was found for the CAD-CAM-fabricated glass fiber post to improve fracture resistance and bond strength. However, the available literature is insufficient to draw definitive conclusions.