Abstract
This paper focuses on the interaction between software prefetching (both binding and nonbinding) and software pipelining for VLIW machines. First, it is shown that evaluating software pipelined schedules without considering memory effects can be rather inaccurate due to stalls caused by dependences with memory instructions (even if a lockup-free cache is considered). It is also shown that the penalty of the stalls is in general higher than the effect of spill code. Second, we show that in general binding schemes are more powerful than nonbinding ones for software pipelined schedules. Finally, the main contribution of this paper is an heuristic scheme that schedules some memory operations according to the locality estimated at compile time and other attributes of the dependence graph. The proposed scheme is shown to outperform other heuristic approaches since it achieves a better trade-off between compute and stall time than the others.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
