C3+ and C3- Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: A Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes

Abstract

Background: Warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (WAIHA) is mostly IgG mediated (IgG+C3-), which may at times fix complement (IgG+C3+). Whether the clinical outcome of complement-fixing (C3+) WAIHA is different from that of non-complement fixing (C3-) WAIHA remains unclear. The goal of this retrospective study was to describe and compare the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with C3+ and C3- WAIHA. Methods: We included adult WAIHA patients seen at our institution from 2001-2023 who met all of the following criteria: A) age >18 years; B) direct antiglobulin test [DAT] IgG+ + C3+ with no cold agglutinin; and C) biochemical evidence of hemolysis. Response to treatment was based on the international consensus criteria: complete (CR; normal Hb or Hb ≥12 g/dL, with resolution of hemolysis); partial (PR; Hb >10 but <12 g/dL or Hgb >12 g/dL without resolution of hemolysis); or no response (neither CR nor PR). 223 WAIHA patients were found, and 132 patients were ultimately included. The most common reason for exclusion was a lack of complete DAT that included C3 testing. Results: There were 59 patients with C3- WAIHA and 73 patients with C3+ WAIHA, reflecting 44.7% and 55.3% of total patients respectively. Pertinent demographic, clinical, and treatment information are shown in Table 1. Slightly over half (52.3%) were males and the mean age (SD) was 63.9 years (18.1). Concomitant lymphoproliferative disease was present in 34.1% of the patients. The 3 most common treatments were steroids (97%), rituximab (66.7%), and splenectomy (18.2%). The median follow-up from diagnosis was 20.0 months (range, 1.0-251.8 months), and 14.4% of patients had died at the time of this analysis with no difference between the groups (P=0.82). There was no significant difference in the demographic composition, clinical findings, and treatment received in both groups. The number of treatments received were similar between C3- and C3+ WAIHA groups (Table 1). After first line of treatment, response was achieved in 86.4% and 94.4% of the C3- and C3+ groups (P=0.12), respectively. Additionally, 62.7% of the C3- group and 80.8% of the C3+ group were in PR or CR by their most recent CBC (P=0.02). 33.9% and 43.8% of the C3- and C3+ groups relapsed at least once (P=0.25). In those who relapsed, there was an average of 2.6 relapse events in the C3- WAIHA group compared to 1.8 relapse events in the C3+ WAIHA group (P=0.03). However, there was no difference in time to first relapse between the groups (P=0.51), shown in Figure 1. Conclusion: There have been retrospective descriptions of multiple AIHA subtypes and response rates to different therapies; however, this is one of the first studies to our knowledge to focus specifically on outcomes between complement subgroups. In our large group of patients with C3- and C3+ WAIHA, the clinical presentation, treatments utilized, and response to treatment were similar. Our data suggest that C3- and C3+ WAIHA can be approached and treated similarly.