C. difficile Screening for Colonization among Surgical Ward Admissions Is Feasible and Useful

Abstract

BackgroundIdentification of patients colonized with C. difficile (CDcol) upon admission and initiation of precautions has been shown to decrease hospital-acquired C. difficileinfection (HA-CDI) in a recent study. We implemented a quality improvement program screening new admissions to a surgical service and evaluated risk factors and outcomes associated with CDcol.MethodsProspective cohort of all patients admitted to the surgical wards including ICU over a 6 month period 10/16–4/17. Upon admission, a perirectal swab was sent for C diff PCR. Patients with positive screens were placed on contact precautions. CDcol patients were not treated. Testing for CDI was done as usual practice only in patients with diarrhea. Main outcome was prevalence of CDcol and relationship to HA-CDI.ResultsOf 708 surgical admissions, 585 (82.6%) patients were screened, 543 were eligible based on first admission; 19 (3.5%) were colonized. Recent surgical hospitalization (OR 13.2, 95% CI 3.4;52.1) and prior CDI (OR 19.5, 95% CI 2.9;127.7) were independent risk factors for CDcol. Antibiotic and PPI use were not associated. Of those with CDcol, 7 developed CDI (36.8%) compared with 5/524 (0.9%) screen negative patients (adj OR 60, 95% CI 12.6;286). CDcol combined with a prior h/o CDI allowed for detection of 8/12 (75%) cases of HA-CDI compared with 3/12 (25%) if only prior history was available. HA-CDI rates on surgical wards after one month post-implementation were 9.3/10,000 bed days of care compared with 12.2 in 2016 and 12.8 in 2015. No delays in bed flow were identified.ConclusionAdmission CDcol prevalence was low in our surgical VA population but was strongly associated with development of HA-CDI. Prior CDI was the strongest risk factor for CDcol and HA-CDI. Knowledge of prior CDI and CDcol status identified 75% of patients who developed CDI, 3 times more than knowledge of prior CDI alone. In certain settings, CDcol screening could improve detection and early isolation of potential CDiff spreaders. Implementation required significant support from administration, nursing and the laboratory, and was successful based on screening percentage without impact on bed flow. Impact on facility CDI rates remains to be fully demonstrated.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.