C-45 A Descriptive Analysis of Change in Concussion Knowledge in Collegiate Student-Athletes Participating in a Novel Peer Concussion Education Program

Abstract

Abstract Objective This pilot study investigated the effect of a novel peer concussion education program on concussion knowledge in a sample of collegiate student-athletes. Method A pre-posttest design was employed to determine the effect of the program on concussion knowledge in a sample of 50 student-athletes (34 Men’s Lacrosse and 16 Women’s Soccer) participating at the NCAA Division II level of competition. Male participants made up 68% of the sample (n = 34). The majority of participants were white (88%). Concussion knowledge was assessed with a checklist adapted from Gioia and Collins’ (2006) Acute Concussion Evaluation and McLeod et al.’s (2007) questionnaire. This checklist included 19 actual symptoms and 8 false symptoms. Results A repeated-measures T Test was conducted to analyze pre-test and post-test scores of total concussion symptom knowledge. The results revealed a significant increase in concussion symptom knowledge after participation in the program, t(48) = 4.2, p < 0.001, d = 0.59. A domain analysis indicated that at baseline, cognitive symptoms were accurately identified at a rate ranging from 68 to 90%, sensory/physical at a rate ranging from 74 to 98% and affective ranging from 42 to 68%. At posttest, these ranges increased to 92-98% for cognitive, 88 to 100% for sensory/physical and 84 to 88% for affective symptoms. Non-symptoms were incorrectly endorsed at a rate ranging from 54 to 92% at baseline and 56 to 76% at posttest. Conclusions The program appears to have potential for increasing knowledge of actual concussion symptoms; however, incorrect endorsement of non-symptoms persisted at a relatively high rate despite participation in the program.