Abstract

Standard catheter-directed thrombolysis (SCDT) harnesses the therapeutic benefit of systemic thrombolytics by infusing the lytic agent directly into the thrombus, thereby, minimizing the dose and bleeding complications in patients presenting with massive and sub-massive PE. Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT) theoretically improves SCDT by disrupting fibrin and increasing the surface area exposed to the agent, but it comes at an increased cost. The purpose of this study is to determine if USAT improves outcomes compared to SCDT.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call