Bystander effects, pharmacokinetics, and linker-payload stability of EGFR-targeting antibody-drug conjugates Losatuxizumab vedotin and Depatux-M in glioblastoma models.

Abstract

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are targeted therapies with robust efficacy in solid cancers, and there is intense interest in using EGFR-specific ADCs to target EGFR-amplified glioblastoma (GBM). Given the molecular heterogeneity of GBM, bystander activity of ADCs may be important for determining treatment efficacy. In this study, the activity and toxicity of two EGFR-targeted ADCs, Losatuxizumab vedotin (ABBV-221) and Depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), with similar auristatin toxins, were compared in GBM patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and normal murine brain following direct infusion by convection enhanced delivery (CED). EGFRviii-amplified and non-amplified GBM PDXs were used to determine in vitro cytotoxicity, in vivo efficacy, and bystander activities of ABBV-221 and Depatux-M. Non-tumor bearing mice were used to evaluate pharmacokinetics and toxicity of ADCs using LC-MS/MS and immunohistochemistry. CED improved intracranial efficacy of Depatux-M and ABBV-221 in three EGFRviii-amplified GBM PDX models (Median survival: 125 to >300 days vs 20-49 days with isotype-control AB095). Both ADCs had comparable in vitro and in vivo efficacy. However, neuronal toxicity and CD68+ microglia/macrophage infiltration were significantly higher in brains infused with ABBV-221, with the cell-permeable MMAE, as compared to Depatux-M, with the cell-impermeant MMAF. CED infusion of ABBV-221 into brain or incubation of ABBV-221 with normal brain homogenate resulted in significant release of MMAE, which is consistent with linker instability in the brain microenvironment. EGFR-targeting ADCs are promising therapeutic options for GBM when delivered intra-tumorally by CED. However, the linker and payload for the ADC must be carefully considered to maximize the therapeutic window.