Abstract
Management of the by-products generated during bioenergy conversion technologies is essential for technology sustainability and due to strict adherence to waste minimisation legislation. We investigated the potential of four types of bioenergy by-products (BEBPs), i.e. char from rice husk and digestates from 3 types of feedstocks: (i) Ipomoea carnea:cow dung (ICD), (ii) rice straw:green gram:cow dung (RGC) and (iii) cow dung (CD) as nutrient input for Zea mays L. Digestates were applied in four application phases, i.e., whole, solid, liquid and ash from solid digestates. BEBPs provoked significant changes in soil pH, electrical conductivity, available NPK, organic carbon and micronutrients depending upon both feedstock and phase. Digestates in solid and whole phases were found better as an organic amendment, whereas RGC and ICD digestates were superior in maintaining higher soil available P and K, respectively. BEBP showed satisfactory performance compared to BEBP-untreated control in terms of crop growth and yield, but chemical treatment resulted in the highest yield. N preservation against volatilization loss may be required through appropriate timing and method of application in case of high-ammonia-N-containing ICD digestates. Outcomes of this investigation are expected to be useful to undertake selective utilization practices of BEBPs for better handling and management.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
