Abstract

Pollination studies often use visitation frequency of potential pollinators as an indicator of their importance, but this is only one component and may not reflect actual pollen transfer rates. In this study, we determine the most effective pollinator group of Angadenia berteroi, a tropical perennial subshrub with large yellow flowers that set few fruits. We determined visitation frequency and pollen transfer effectiveness of the four most common groups of visitors (long- and short-tongued bees, and skipper and non-skipper butterflies). Using potted plants, we exposed flowers to single visits from different types of pollinators to measure fruit set. We demonstrate that A. berteroi is most effectively pollinated by long-tongued bees, though many other species visit the flowers; the most frequent visitor group is not the most important pollinator, because they neither carry nor deposit much pollen, as the width of their proboscis is small compared with long-tongued bees. In this system, the width of the proboscis of the pollinators correlates with pollen transfer efficiency. Our results demonstrate the importance of pollen removal, pollen deposition, and fruit set, in determining the most effective pollinators, rather than visitor frequency. The distinctive morphology of these flowers, with a large bell and a narrow, short tube, suggests that other flowers of this shape may similarly benefit more from visitors with mouthparts shorter than previously considered optimal.

Highlights

  • The evolution and diversification of the perianth has been associated with pollinator attraction (Proctor et al 1996; Inouye and Kearns 1997; Richards 1997) and mechanical fit (Fenster et al 2004)

  • Several studies have reported that the body structure of floral visitors, especially the feeding apparatus associated with the dimensions and the morphology of the flowers, is one of the factors determining which visitors can effectively function as pollinators (Inouye 1980; Waser et al 1996; Anderson et al 2002; Castellanos et al 2004; Ibanez 2012; Moreet al. 2012; Miller et al 2014)

  • We address the following questions: (i) What is the diversity and abundance of animals visiting the flowers? (ii) Are all visitors effective at transferring pollen to conspecifics? And if not, why? We used a variety of methods to determine the effectiveness of each type of floral visitor in terms of pollen removal, simulated pollen deposition and fruit set

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The evolution and diversification of the perianth has been associated with pollinator attraction (Proctor et al 1996; Inouye and Kearns 1997; Richards 1997) and mechanical fit (Fenster et al 2004). Several studies have reported that the body structure of floral visitors, especially the feeding apparatus associated with the dimensions and the morphology of the flowers, is one of the factors determining which visitors can effectively function as pollinators In hawkmoth-pollinated plants, floral tube length determines which species may transfer pollen; hawkmoths with tongues that are too short or too long will not pick up pollen effectively Flower width has been associated with pollen transfer and pollination efficiency (Galen 1989; Campbell et al 1996)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call