Abstract
Stanley Fish's essay, Normal Circumstances . . .and Other Special Cases (Critical Inquiry 4 [Summer 1978]: 625-44), is so agile and compelling that it may seem unduly quarrelsome to raise questions about it. But it presents a picture of the way we understand both events and texts that one would not, I presume, want to accept unless there were no conceivable escape. The essay suggests that literary texts and what they contain change; that two readers with different interpretive assumptions do not, indeed cannot, read the same text even if they are reading things called, say, Samson Agonistes, consisting of the same words in the same order; that meaning results from the interplay of our verbal and mental categories and situations alone and is not constrained by the language used; that there is no difference between direct and indirect speech acts; that the illocutionary force of any utterance is determined entirely by the context in which it is uttered.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
