Abstract
The tension between what is ‘auctorysed’ and what ‘som men say’ offers a glimpse into Malory’s sense of his authorship and reminds us that texts are places of interpretive activity. In addition, I reconsider William Caxton’s role as editor and problematize the role of authorial intention as the basis for the Field edition of 2013.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.