Buspirone effects in an animal conflict procedure: Comparison with diazepam and phenobarbital

Abstract

Buspirone has been introduced as a novel non-benzodiazepine anti-anxiety agent. The Conditioned Suppression of Drinking (CSD) paradigm is an “animal model” for anxiety which provides information on both the relative potency and relative efficacy of anti-conflict agents. The present study compared the anti-conflict effects of buspirone to those of more “classical” anti-anxiety agents, diazepam and phenobarbital. In daily 10-minute sessions, water-deprived rats were trained to drink from a tube which was occasionally electrified (0.5 mA), electrification being signalled by a tone. Within 2–3 weeks control CSD responding had stabilized (approximately 15–20 shocks/session and 10–15 ml water/session); drug tests were conducted at weekly intervals. Diazepam and phenobarbital markedly (400–500%) increased the number of shocks received at doses which did not depress background responding (i.e., water intake). A number of agents, most notably morphine and ethanol, did not reliably affect punished responding in the CSD. Administered IP, low doses (0.25–1 mg/kg) of buspirone increased punished responding only slightly (less than 100% increase); higher doses (2, 4 mg/kg) depressed background responding. Administered SC, buspirone (0.125–1.0 mg/kg) had more potent effects on both punished and unpunished responding; again, anti-conflict efficacy was only marginal. These results suggest that buspirone might be less effective than the benzodiazepines in the management of anxiety.