Abstract

The Business Process Execution Language (BPEL) has become the standard in web service composition, so that been adopted by industries to create mission critical services. The business process reliability especially business process consistency when some services failed is critical to composite services especially involving various organizations. However, it is difficult to conduct business process reliability testing for composite services due to complex business process in service composition, remote deployed services and long time testing duration. Little research is done to test fault tolerance capabilities of composite services only from low level. This paper proposes a technique on how to test the reliability of composite service defined in BPEL from the view of business semantics with little cost using fault injection. We present an approach for reliability testing of web services by using service stubs with semantic faults instead of real services which can be placed at service provider side or service consumer side. Dislike existing studies, we focus on how to find the reliability problems associating with business process - called semantics as the problems are not pure coding error but faults related to business process. In addition, the behavior of composite services in BPEL is analyzed when there are faults in orchestrated services invoked. Finally, a case study is given to show the whole process of reliability testing for composite web service.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.