Abstract

Business model management is critical in the development of business models aimed to launch innovations and generate high venture performance. This study presents the use of personal construct theory and the repertory grid methodology, a new technique to explore central factors in entrepreneurs’ business model management. We identify typologies for business model management and underlying logics of these typologies. The study advances the business model literature in several ways. First it contributes with visualisation of entrepreneurs’ business model management and hence adds dimension of business model management. Second, theories and methods from cognitive psychology contribute to the literature with new knowledge on business model management. Repertory grid methodology, developed from Personal construct theory, enable identification of entrepreneurial cognitions of business models. Through 11 semi-structured interviews with serial entrepreneurs in the mobile service sector, this paper contributes with a framework that advances the business model literature by identifying business model management strategies and its defining features. Three categories are identified including six types of business model management strategies for navigating management of business models. The identified categories are: 1) “Comprehensive management” characterized by various levels of complexity, uncertainty, and variation, 2) “Risk management” characterized by various types of risks e.g. business, financial and social, and 3) “Resource management” characterized of various types of capital; e.g. financial, social, human, and innovation. The business model management typologies may assist entrepreneurs to reflect on their business model design and management. This study suggests that the repertory grid technique may be useful in understanding business model management.

Highlights

  • What enables some innovative ventures to survive and become successful while others do not? the venture’s business model is critical for the venture’s enactment

  • The principal components analyses (PCA) indicated a complex pattern of business model factors in the mobile service sector

  • Since each management typology relates to a Pole and Contrast, a total number of six typologies explains the dynamic processes in business model management on the polar ends of three dimensions; 1) Comprehensive business model management (Polar ends: Demanding vs. Simple); 2) Risk management business model (Polar ends: High risk vs. Low risk;, 3) Resource acquisition business management (Polar ends: Extended vs. Limited)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

What enables some innovative ventures to survive and become successful while others do not? the venture’s business model is critical for the venture’s enactment. Business models have been a defining feature in innovation and its management, which is widely considered as the basis of a competitive economy (Xavier, 2010; Lindgren, 2012). Business models as such are not enough; ventures need to manage the business models to become competitive. Without a well-developed business model, innovators will fail to either deliver or to capture value from their innovations. This is especially true for, business models in in many sectors undergoing transition due to higher degree of customer focus in the business models. Businesses need to re-evaluate the value propositions in the business models presented to customers (Teece, 2010)

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call