Abstract

Investigations of corporate failure prediction research usually implement binary classification into one of the distinguished groups – Distress or non-Distress companies. This study looks at a tri-dimensional approach which cluster firms into three (3) distinct dimensions namely - non-distress, semi-distressed and distressed. The study used secondary data from 2011 to 2015 obtained from the Ghana Stock Exchange (GSE) spanning across six industries, namely, Banking & Finance, Distribution, Food & Beverage, Insurance, Manufacturing and Mining & Oil. The study initially adopted the Altman (1968) Z score bankruptcy model to classify companies into non-distress, semi-distressed and distressed. Further analysis was conducted using the Hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis to cluster companies into non-distress, semi-distressed and distressed. A comparison was then made between the Hierarchical agglomerative clustering against the Altman (1968) Z score bankruptcy classification to obtain higher classification. The outcome of the analysis revealed that the Hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis and the Altman (1968) Z score bankruptcy model can both be used to classify companies into nondistress, semi-distressed and distressed based on the tri-dimensional approach instead of the binary classification (distressed and non-distressed). The study recommends that future research can explore other clustering methods for bankruptcy prediction to achieve higher and better classification.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call