Abstract
Hyman Minsky’s and Friedrich Hayek’s theories on the business cycle are often regarded as fundamentally divergent even when they share certain points in common: while Minsky attributes the cause of economic fluctuations to the inherently speculative tendencies of financial markets, Hayek blames central banks for credit manipulation. This paper aims to demonstrate that the similarities between both authors are greater than generally believed and that actually some consensus exists in their writings: both authors think that the economic boom is the result of an unsustainable credit expansion and that the depression can be explained by financial or, ultimately, real constraints.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
