Abstract

The Treaty of Lisbon was a milestone in the enduring process of empowerment of the European Parliament and its connections to the European Commission. This latest reform of the Treaties, in force since December 2009, placed the only supranational institution whose members are directly elected by all citizens of the EU (since 1979) on an equal footing with the Council as a co-legislator in around thirty additional policy areas. The Treaty of Lisbon also strengthened the European Parliament in terms of the annual and multiannual budgetary decisions, and it granted it the right to elect the President of the European Commission according to the results of the European elections. This article examines various possible effects of this major boost of the European Parliament, along with links to the European Commission in the manifestos issued by five European parties: the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE), European Free Alliance (EFA), European Green Party (European Greens or EGP), European People’s Party (EPP), and Party of European Socialists (PES). It studies variations from 2004 onwards in the scope of the programmatic proposals regarding EU domains of power, the footprint in the manifestos of the transnational party organisations themselves, and eventually also of their candidates for the presidency of the European Commission. To do so, the twenty manifestos issued by the abovementioned parties for the 2004, 2009, 2014 and 2019 European elections were content analysed. The results point to the lasting distance between these transnational parties and the European elections, despite the reinforcement of the role of the European Parliament over time.

Highlights

  • The Treaty of Lisbon was a milestone in the enduring process of empowerment of the European Parliament and its connections to the European Commission

  • For the institutional reasons that were mentioned previously, the following four hypotheses about the relationships between the strengthening of the European Parliament and its connections to the European Commission through the Treaty of Lisbon, on the one hand, and the manifestos issued for the 2014 and 2019 European elections, on the other, are proposed: We considered it crucial to limit the scope of this research to supranational issues because a certain misunderstanding continues to exist between “Europe” as a single issue and European Union (EU) themes

  • As was pointed out earlier, the following four hypotheses are to be tested: variations in the extent of the policy offer on current EU domains of power were not shaped by the Treaty of Lisbon (H1), the footprint in the manifestos of the transnational party organisations was not influenced by the Treaty of Lisbon (H2), candidates for president of the European Commission (Spitzenkandidat(en)) remain absent from the party manifestos (H3), and the Treaty of Lisbon did not enhance co-writing or co-responsibility for the policy offer between national and European parties (H4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article examines various possible effects of this major boost of the European Parliament, along with links to the European Commission in the manifestos issued by five European parties: the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE), European Free Alliance (EFA), European Green Party (European Greens or EGP), European People’s Party (EPP), and Party of European Socialists (PES). It studies variations from 2004 onwards in the scope of the programmatic proposals regarding EU domains of power, the footprint in the manifestos of the transnational party organisations themselves, and eventually of their candidates for the presidency of the European Commission. Palabras clave: Parlamento Europeo; partidos políticos a escala europea; ALDE; ALE; PVE; PPE; PSE

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call