Buried island transposition flap for joint Plastic-Neurosurgical management of spinal wound dehiscence – a technical note and single Centre experience

Abstract

Introduction Spinal surgical wound infection can lead to tissue voids between the spine and skin that can be difficult to reconstruct. Previously described techniques include myocutaneous flaps or perforator based fasciocutaneous flaps. However, these procedures can be time-consuming and surgically challenging. Aims This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a novel technique employing a buried island transposition (BIT) flap, for the repair of non-irradiated dehisced spinal wounds. Methods Fifteen patients with failed conservative management of infected midline posterior spinal wounds, underwent wound repair using a local buried islanded de-epithelialized double-breasted fasciocutaneous transposition flap, performed by joint input from the neurosurgical and plastic surgical teams. Results Mean age was 58 years (range, 31–76 years) with male-to-female ratio of 8:7. The BIT flap was used to repair four wounds in the cervical spine with underlying fixation; four wounds in the thoracic spine with underlying fixation; and seven wounds in the lumbar-sacral spine, of which three had underlying fixation. Pre-operatively, each of the wounds were either dehiscent with exposed hardware, or had large defects unsuitable for primary closure following debridement. There was no procedure-related mortality. All patients demonstrated good wound healing with no subsequent repeat surgery or removal of spinal fixation at mean 24-month follow-up. Conclusion We successfully used a novel buried island transposition flap that has not previously been described in repair of spinal wounds. This technique, which led in all cases to good wound healing and prevented removal of metalwork, has comparable efficacy but increased ease of use compared to traditional techniques. It requires redundant skin at the wound site.