Abstract
Under the new kidney allocation system (KAS), implemented in 2014, the distribution of the best quality donor kidney grafts shifted between age groups, but it is unclear whether this change translates to meaningful differences in post-transplant outcomes. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 20,345 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients before and 4,605 recipients after implementation of the KAS using data from the United Network of Organ Sharing. Overall, two-year mortality was greater among recipients in the post-KAS era compared with the pre-KAS era (6.31% vs 5.91% respectively, [p = 0.01]), and two-year graft loss was not significantly different between eras (9.95% and 9.65%, respectively [p = 0.13]). In analysis stratified by age group (18–45, 46–55, 56–65, and ≥66 years), relative risk of mortality was 1.48 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09–1.98) among recipients 46–55 years old and 1.47 (95% CI 1.18–1.81) among recipients 56–65 years old. Relative risk of all-cause graft loss was 1.43 (95% CI 1.20–1.70) among recipients 56–65 years old. There were no significant differences in relative risk of mortality or graft loss associated with the KAS era among other age groups. After adjustment for recipient characteristics and characteristics of the changing donor pool, relative risk of two-year mortality and graft loss associated with the post-KAS era was attenuated for recipients aged 46–55 and 56–65 years, but remained statistically significant. In this early analysis after implementation of the KAS, there is suggestion that increased risk of mortality and graft loss may be disproportionately borne by middle-aged recipients, which is only partially accounted for by changes in recipient and donor characteristics. These findings signal a need to continue to monitor the effects of the KAS to ensure that allocation practices both maximize utility of the kidney graft pool and respect fairness between age groups.
Highlights
Deceased donor kidney grafts available for transplantation in patients with end-stage renal disease are a scarce and precious societal resource
Deceased donor kidney transplant recipients were more often black and/or Hispanic and fewer had diabetes in the post-kidney allocation system (KAS) era compared with the pre-KAS era (Table 1)
A greater proportion of recipients had received a prior kidney transplant in the post-KAS era compared with the pre-KAS era
Summary
Deceased donor kidney grafts available for transplantation in patients with end-stage renal disease are a scarce and precious societal resource. In order to address recognized disparities in access to transplantation among patients with a high degree of sensitization to donor antigens and those who are listed late after starting dialysis, these groups are given special priority on the deceased donor waitlist [3, 4] Because these groups are at higher risk of poor post-transplant outcomes, the transplant community acknowledged that these particular modifications to the allocation system—though intended to improve fairness—would sacrifice some utility in terms of overall life-years gained from the limited organ supply [4]. While longevity matching only explicitly involves the 20% of kidney grafts with the highest quality as estimated by the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) and the 20% of recipients with the longest estimated post-transplant survival (EPTS), the types and characteristics of grafts remaining in the donor pool that are allocated to the remaining 80% of recipients will inevitably differ
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
