Abstract
Aim: The aim of the paper is a brief review of the past 30 years of domestic legislation concerning the criminal act of money laundering, also to summarise the lessons learned from the modifications and to outline some aspects of legal-interpretation. Methodology: The paper analyses the periodical changes of the phrasing of the act and the legal policy intentions in connection with these changes. It takes a position on the academic debates concerning the application of the offence and critically assesses legal practice. Findings: The current legislation and practice of money laundering is still not without inconsistencies. Qualification of specific acts as money laundering could often contradict fundamental legal principles, the proper interpretation of actual or pseudo multiple-offence theory, the concurring aspects of aiding and abetting versus subsidiary or collateral offences, and the necessity to justify culpability or mens rea. While not disputing the legitimate purpose of the offence, nevertheless with an expectation of a more critical attitude regarding its application, effective investigation of the preliminary offences shall not be de-emphasised, as its effectiveness is still the most effective way to the prevention of money laundering. Value: The conclusions may contribute to a better founded jurisprudence concerning money laundering, as well as it may provide guidance for future codification considerations.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
