Abstract

This transversal study over a random representative sample of 1687 Mexican students attending public and private secondary schools (54% girls, 12–17 years old, M = 13.65. DT = 1.14) aimed to analyze psychosocial differences between victims and non-victims of bullying from the bioecological model. It included individual variables (ontosystem), familiar, community, and scholar factors (microsystem), and gender (macrosystem) to perform a multivariate discriminant analysis and a logistic regression analysis. The discriminant analysis found that psychological distress, offensive communication with mother and father, and a positive attitude toward social norms transgression characterized the high victimization cluster. For the non-victims, the discriminant variables were community implication, positive attitude toward institutional authority, and open communication with the mother. These variables allowed for correctly predicting membership in 76% of the cases. Logistic regression analysis found that psychological distress, offensive communication with the father, and being a boy increased the probability of high victimization, while a positive attitude toward authority, open communication with the mother, and being a girl decrease this probability. These results highlight the importance of open and offensive communication between adolescents and their parents on psychological distress, attitude toward authority, community implication, and bullying victimization.

Highlights

  • The research about bullying victimization shows that the most prejudicial consequences in development and health impacts on the victims [1,2]

  • The strongest correlations correspond to Psychological Distress (PD) and relational and verbal victimization

  • This study aimed to analyze, from an ecological approach, the psychosocial variables that allow for differentiating adolescent victims and non-victims of bullying, including psychological distress, parents–adolescent communication with mother and father, positive attitude toward institutional authority (PAIA), positive attitude toward social norms transgression (PASNT), perceived community support, and gender

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The research about bullying victimization shows that the most prejudicial consequences in development and health impacts on the victims [1,2]. These adverse effects fall into the leading mental health problems worldwide [3], including internalizing problems, such as depression, anxiety, and suicidal behavior [4,5,6,7], and externalizing ones, such as violent and delinquent behavior, substance use disorders, and sexual risk behavior [4,7,8,9]. This difference of power is best determined for the victims’ subjective perception that it is impossible for them to get out of the situation or to defend themselves [13].

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.