Abstract

We prove a theorem showing that the existence of “private” curves in the bulk of AdS implies two regions of the dual CFT share strong correlations. A private curve is a causal curve which avoids the entanglement wedge of a specified boundary region mathcal{U} . The implied correlation is measured by the conditional mutual information Ileft({mathcal{V}}_1:left.{mathcal{V}}_2right|mathcal{U}right) , which is O(1/GN) when a private causal curve exists. The regions {mathcal{V}}_1 and {mathcal{V}}_2 are specified by the endpoints of the causal curve and the placement of the region mathcal{U} . This gives a causal perspective on the conditional mutual information in AdS/CFT, analogous to the causal perspective on the mutual information given by earlier work on the connected wedge theorem. We give an information theoretic argument for our theorem, along with a bulk geometric proof. In the geometric perspective, the theorem follows from the maximin formula and entanglement wedge nesting. In the information theoretic approach, the theorem follows from resource requirements for sending private messages over a public quantum channel.

Highlights

  • In this article we expand on this lightcone-entanglement connection by introducing a second theorem relating the geometry of light cones to boundary entanglement

  • The theorem relates the existence of a special class of causal curves in the bulk to the quantum conditional mutual information of associated boundary regions becoming O(1/GN )

  • The entanglement wedge of a boundary region A is denoted by EA

Read more

Summary

Geometric preliminaries

We recall the maximin formula [3, 5], which is one way of stating the generalization of the Ryu-Takayanagi formula to dynamic spacetimes. We will establish that I(V1 : V2 | U ) is well defined and in particular finite For this to be the case, we need that the regions V1, V2, U are all spacelike separated, coincident boundaries between V1 and U and V2 and U are allowed. If the area terms in I(A : C | B) cancel, leaving only a possible bulk entropy contribution all of the following statements hold: 1. In the proof of the privacy-duality theorem, we will see that the existence of a private curve implies that either condition 1 or condition 3 is violated. The proof relies on the quantum focusing conjecture With these preliminaries in hand we move on to prove the privacy-duality theorem

Geometric proof
Localizing and excluding quantum information
The secret message task
Quantum tasks argument for privacy-duality
Case where mutual information is small
Case with degenerate areas
Counterexample to converse of the theorem
Discussion
Relationship with the connected wedge theorem
Causal conditions for other entropy inequalities
Implications for quantum information theory
A Proof of lemma 3
C Why the conditional mutual information?
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call