Abstract

Bulk heterojunction solar cells based on blends of quantum dots and conjugated polymers are a promising configuration for obtaining high-efficiency, cheaply fabricated solution-processed photovoltaic devices. Such devices are of significant interest as they have the potential to leverage the advantages of both types of materials, such as the high mobility, band gap tunability and possibility of multiple exciton generation in quantum dots together with the high mechanical flexibility and large molar extinction coefficient of conjugated polymers. Despite these advantages, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of these hybrid devices has remained relatively low at around 6%, well behind that of all-organic or all-inorganic solar cells. This is attributed to major challenges that still need to be overcome before conjugated polymer–quantum dot blends can be considered viable for commercial application, such as controlling the film morphology and interfacial structure to ensure efficient charge transfer and charge transport. In this work, we present our findings with respect to the recent development of bulk heterojunctions made from conjugated polymer–quantum dot blends, list the ongoing strategies being attempted to improve performance, and highlight the key areas of research that need to be pursued to further develop this technology.

Highlights

  • In society today, fossil fuels such as natural gas, oil and coal dominate the energy market.growing concerns over the limited reserves of such fuels and environmental issues has led to heightened interest in the search for alternative energy sources

  • While bulk heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells incorporating QDs and conjugated polymers may provide significant advantages for the purpose of increased efficiencies—including the tunable band gaps, possibility of multiple exciton generation and photochemical stability of quantum dots with the large molar extinction coefficient and high mechanical flexibility of conjugated polymers—reported device energy conversion efficiencies seem to have plateaued at ~3%–5% using a variety of quantum dots (CdSe, PbS, PbSe, CdTe) and different conjugated polymers [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]

  • In non-inverted heterojunctions (Figure 10), the electron-collecting contact typically requires a thin layer of an unstable all-organic bulk heterojunctions (Figure 10), the electron-collecting contact typically requires a thin low work function metal such as Ca, Mg or LiF followed by a layer of Al, which has a harmful layer of an unstable low work function metal such as Ca, Mg or LiF followed by a layer of Al, which effect on the ambient stability and operational lifetime of the resulting solar cell

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fossil fuels such as natural gas, oil and coal dominate the energy market. While BHJ solar cells incorporating QDs and conjugated polymers may provide significant advantages for the purpose of increased efficiencies—including the tunable band gaps, possibility of multiple exciton generation and photochemical stability of quantum dots with the large molar extinction coefficient and high mechanical flexibility of conjugated polymers—reported device energy conversion efficiencies seem to have plateaued at ~3%–5% using a variety of quantum dots (CdSe, PbS, PbSe, CdTe) and different conjugated polymers (polyphenylenevinylenes, polythiophenes and copolymers of fluorenes, carbazoles, benzothiazadoles, diketopyrrolopyrroles, etc.) [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Factors such as film morphology are of great importance to increase their viability for commercial applications as well as a deeper fundamental understanding of the mechanisms involved when the two material classes of II–VI quantum dots and conjugated polymers are used together

Overall Energy Conversion
Equivalent Circuit for Hybrid BHJ Solar Cells
Photon Absorption and Formation of Excitons
Charge
Charge mechanisms dot bulk heterojunction
Charge Collection
Conjugated
As methods of of
Common
Quantum
12. Colloidally
Design Considerations
Material Selection
Device Architecture and Fabrication
Poor Interfacial Electronic Coupling Due to Stabilizing Ligands
Local Crystallinity
Interfacial Engineering
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call