Abstract

The current study investigates buildup and breakdown of echo suppression for stimuli presented over headphones. The stimuli consisted of pairs of 120-micros clicks. The leading click (lead) and the lagging click (lag) in each pair were lateralized on opposite sides of the midline by means of interaural level differences (ILDs) of +/-10 dB or interaural time differences (ITDs) of +/-300 micros. Echo threshold was measured with an adaptive one-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice procedure with a subjective decision criterion, in which listeners had to report whether they heard a single, fused auditory event on one side of the midline, or two separate events on both sides. In the control conditions, referred to as the "single" conditions, echo threshold was measured for a single click pair, the test pair, presented in isolation. In addition to the control conditions, two kinds of test conditions were investigated, in which the test pair was preceded by 12 identical conditioning pairs: in the "same" conditions, the interaural configuration (ILDs or ITDs) of the conditioning pairs was identical to that of the test pair; in the "switch" conditions, the interaural configuration of lead and lag was reversed between the conditioning pairs and the test pair, in order to produce a switch in the lateralizations of the stimuli between the conditioning train and the test pair. No matter whether the lateralization of the clicks was produced by ILDs or by ITDs, most listeners experienced a buildup of echo suppression in the "same" conditions, manifested by a prolongation of echo threshold relative to the respective "single" conditions. However, the breakdown of echo suppression was much stronger in the ILD-switch than in the ITD-switch conditions. In five out of six listeners, the ITD switch had hardly any effect on echo threshold, although the ITDs (+/-300 micros) produced roughly the same degree of lateral displacement as the ILDs (+/-10 dB). These results suggest that the dynamic processes in echo suppression operate differentially in pathways responsible for the processing of interaural time and level differences.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call