Abstract

In reality, friendship is not a zero or one relationship and it is not always reciprocal. We analyze how the degree of CEO-directors friendship and players’ recognition of this degree can affect the actions in the agency model. The degree of friendship will determine ones’ prosocial preferences, which then affect managerial efforts and compensation. Our results show that, when players’ prosocial preferences are publicly known and when the CEO cares more about directors, he puts in more effort to increase the firm value. On the other hand, if directors care more about the CEO, then they are willing to reward a higher salary to compensate for the CEO’s effort cost. However, if directors were to know that the CEO cares about their welfare more and the CEO himself would have a high incentive to put in effort, then directors should reward the CEO less! This indicates that the CEO has an incentive to hide his prosocial preference. Our discussions on the two private information cases help explain players’ incentives of strategic hiding, by characterizing the pooling, separating and partial pooling equilibria in the signaling frameworks.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call