Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper compares Building Control Virtual Test Bed (BCVTB) and Functional Mock-up Interface (FMI) standard to conduct coupled energy modelling and control for academic and research campuses. The intent is to systematically compare BCVTB and FMI. As proof-of-concept demonstration, building energy models of Colorado School of Mines are developed in EnergyPlus and coupled through BCVTB and FMI. The coupled models in BCVTB and FMI represent a virtual campus and they are compared from different perspectives such as simulation runtime, easiness of employing simple if–then–else control, easiness of integrating other programs and feasibility to employ advanced control and optimization. Overall, FMI standard is more promising due to its (a) capability to be programmed in a multithreading manner, (b) capability to be implemented as Gauβ–Seidl and Jacobi methods of loose coupling and (c) higher feasibility to implement advanced control and optimization programs.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
