Abstract
The objective of this paper is to briefly describe the various building condition assessment metrics, including their strengths and weaknesses and how they support building infrastructure asset management. The approaches fall into two categories: monetary-derived and engineering-derived. Monetary approaches include backlog and the Facility Condition Index (FCI), both of which are economic or financial health metrics. The engineering-derived approach is the Building Condition Index (BCI) series, which a performance health metric. This paper addresses why both the FCI and BCI condition assessment metrics constitute a building asset management “best practice” when used together and computed from a distress-based inspection process.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
