Abstract

This paper constitutes a first attempt at constructing semantic theories over institutions and examining the logical relations holding between different such theories. Our results show that this approach can be very useful for theoretical computer science (and may also contribute to the current philosophical debate regarding the semantic and the syntactic presentation of scientific theories). First we provide a definition of semantic theories in the institution theory framework - in terms of a set of models satisfying a given set of sentences - using the language-independent satisfaction relation characterizing institutions (Definition 17.3). Then we give a proof of the logical equivalence holding between the syntactic and the semantic presentation of a theory, based on the Galois connection holding between sentences and models (Theorem 17.1). We also show how to integrate and combine semantic theories using colimits (Theorem 17.2). Finally we establish when the output of a model-based software verification method applied to a semantic theory over an institution also holds for a semantic theory defined over a different institution (Theorem 17.3).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.