Abstract

It has been suggested that the method of constructing an urban spatial structure typically follows a forward process from planning and design up to expression, as reflected in both graphic and text descriptions of urban planning. Although unorthodox, the original status structures can be extracted and constructed from an existing urban land-use map. This approach not only provides the methodological foundation for urban spatial structure evolution and allows for a comparative and quantitative analysis between the existing and planned conditions, but also lays a theoretical basis for failure in scientific decision making during the planning phase. This study attempts to achieve this by identifying the city centre (a typical element of the urban spatial structure) from urban land use data. The city centre is a special region consisting of several units with particular spatial information, including geometric attributes, topological attributes, and thematic attributes. In this paper, we develop a methodology to support the delineation of the city centre, considering these factors. First, using commercial land data, we characterise the city centre as units based on a series of indicators, including geometric and thematic attributes, and integrate them into a composite index of “urban centrality”; Second, a graph-based spatial clustering method that considers both topological proximity and attribute similarity is designed and used to identify the city centre. The precise boundary of the city centre is subsequently delimited using a shape reconstruction method based on the cluster results. Finally, we present a case study to demonstrate the effectiveness and practicability of the methodology.

Highlights

  • Urban spatial structure is viewed as a generalized description of elements arranged in geographic space and the process of element interactions [1]

  • In the field of urban planning, the construction method of urban internal spatial structures typically follows a forward process from planning to expression; i.e., city planners aim to design a reasonable urban spatial structure to guide the development of a city, which is reflected in a graphic description of urban planning that emphasizes urban spatial structure

  • Status structures provide the methodological foundation of urban spatial structure evolution for comparative and quantitative analysis between existing and planned conditions, and lay a theoretical basis for failure in scientific decision making during the planning phase

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urban spatial structure is viewed as a generalized description of elements arranged in geographic space and the process of element interactions [1]. Providing more of the higher-level semantics in urban land datasets could allow the Urban Planning Bureau to respond better to user requirements This allows the representation of city space to be closer to the way it is conceptualized by people [11] and not reflected in graphic descriptions of urban planning that emphasize the urban spatial structure. Based on the questions above, this study primarily aimed to establish an applicable methodology oriented towards urban land use for identifying city centre areas. In this context, we addressed the two following questions:. This research contributes to determining the city centre, considering geometric and topological attributes, and socio-economic attributes

Related Work
Construction of Spatial Proximity Relationships
Algorithm Description
Implementation Procedure of the Algorithm
Extraction of Indicators
Characterising the City Center
Index of Urban Centrality
Extracting the City Centre Area
Application
Findings
Clustering Commercial Land with Attributes
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call