Abstract

Hyperspectral imaging offers spectral resolution unavailable with traditional remote sensing platforms, yet integrating a sensor onto an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platform is a nontrivial task. Although commercial off-the-shelf systems are available at attractive prices, there are few comparative performance metrics, and the community has yet to establish a modus operandi for scientific-grade hyperspectral UAV platforms. Researchers investing in hyperspectral UAV assets must have a firm grasp of their operational needs in conjunction with an understanding of hardware costs versus performance trade-offs. Hyperspectral sensors, being the core of the UAV platform, varies considerably in their design and performance, with optical physics imposing a hard limit on their capabilities. This chapter will review the main differences between the types of pushbroom hyperspectral sensors, and the key performance indicators that contribute to a scientific-grade instrument based on our experience. In particular, how sensor characteristics such as dynamic range, full well capacity, and bit depth translate into sensor performance in real-world applications is discussed. Understanding sensor limitations helps manage researcher expectations, especially since low-quality equipment can lead to imaging artifacts, that is, the vignetting effect, which may require correction as part of the image acquisition workflow.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.