Abstract

Empirical research into judicial behaviour and the legal system is bountiful in the United States, but few and far between in Europe. The next frontier is legal big data analysis. In this paper, I describe the methodological framework of my PhD research, in which I empirically investigate the influence of the Belgian Court of Cassation on the lower judiciary through a study of the citation of the Court of Cassation’s case law. Emphasis is placed on the theoretical foundation, research hypotheses and methodology. The normative significance of this research is considerable: the aim is to uncover the nature of precedent in a civil law jurisdiction, viewed from a hierarchical perspective, and thus, whether or not case law is considered a source of law in daily practice.

Highlights

  • Empirical research into judicial behaviour and the legal system is bountiful in the United States, but few and far between in Europe.[1]

  • Computational empirical research within legal academia is scarce in Europe, where traditional research methodology still reigns supreme.[73]

  • The legal empiricist has to bridge the gap between law, an area in which methodology is traditionally considered to be of little importance, and methodologies of the social sciences, which are often not transplanted into the legal domain. This might discourage those willing to venture beyond the traditional borders of legal academia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Empirical research into judicial behaviour and the legal system is bountiful in the United States, but few and far between in Europe.[1]. I describe the methodological framework of my PhD research, in which I empirically investigate the influence of the Belgian Court of Cassation on the lower judiciary. This research is very much still a work in progress, as the software to analyse the assembled data is still in an initial testing phase. I contextualize firstly my research question by briefly touching upon the Court of Cassation and the reigning theories on the authority of its case law (Section 1). I will discuss the operationalization of the research and the state of the art with regard to legal citation studies, highlighting the difficulties specific to Belgium that significantly impact my methodology (Section 2).

See for example with regard to the Belgian Constitutional Court
The authoritativeness of the Court of Cassation’s case law
Citations as influence
State of the art
Belgian citation practice
Implicit citations
Research hypotheses
Hierarchy
35 See the report of the Commission for the Modernization of the Judiciary
Geography
Centre-periphery
Jurisprudential pluralism
Role of the appellate courts
Text parser
29. The same can be said for France
Caché database management system
Post-network methodology
Multivariate regression analysis
Social network analysis
Normative implications
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.