Abstract

Scientists who are interested in building research programs at primarily-undergraduate institutions (PUIs) have unique considerations compared to colleagues at research-intensive (R1) institutions. Maintaining a research program at a PUI holds unique challenges that should be considered before prospective faculty go on the job market, as they negotiate a job offer, and after they begin a new position. In this article we describe some of the considerations that aspiring and newly hired faculty should keep in mind as they plan out how they will set up a laboratory as a new Principle Investigator (PI) at a PUI.Anyone hoping to start a research program at a PUI should understand both the timeframe of interviews, job offers, and negotiations and the challenges and rewards of working with undergraduate researchers. Once a job is offered, candidates should be aware of the range of negotiable terms that can be part of a start-up package. Space and equipment considerations are also important, and making the most of shared spaces, existing infrastructure, and deals can extend the purchasing power of start-up funds as a new PIs builds their lab. PUIs’ focus on undergraduate education and mentorship leads to important opportunities for collaboration, funding, and bringing research projects directly into undergraduate teaching laboratories.A major focus of any new laboratory leader must be on building a productive, equitable, and supportive laboratory community. Equitable onboarding, mentorship plans, and formalized expectations, can all help build a productive and sustainable laboratory research program. However, important considerations about safety, inclusion, student schedules, and a PI’s own professional commitments are also extremely important concerns when working with undergraduates in research. A successful research program at a PUI will bring students into meaningful scientific inquiry and requires insights and skills that are often not the focus of scientific training. This article aims to describe the scope of setting up a new laboratory as a way to alleviate some of the burden that new and prospective faculty often feel.

Highlights

  • Participation in research has important impacts on students, including gains in science identity and retention in biological science [1–3]

  • It is critical that laboratory research at Primarily undergraduate institution (PUI) be centered around faculty with the interest, motivation, and resources to effectively train, mentor, and support their student researchers

  • Starting a research program at a PUI will likely involve a shift in expectations but that does not mean that research has to halt or become less interesting or less rigorous

Read more

Summary

Background

Participation in research has important impacts on students, including gains in science identity and retention in biological science [1–3]. Start-up packages usually include 1) funds to equip and support a new research laboratory and research program, 2) teaching load progression, 3) service load progression, 4) fringe and other benefits, and 5) start time. If getting a grant or publishing research with students is important for tenure and promotion, equipping your lab to achieve those goals should help guide your start-up spending. Because undergraduate students have packed schedules, and can be inexpert in reading primary literature, journal clubs are terrific ways to bring all members of the group into the conversation, even if research-driven lab meetings aren’t always possible Active learning strategies such as jigsaws, justin-time teaching, and exit slips [26, 27] and resources and protocols such as C.R.E.A.T.E. Seek feedback from peers, trusted colleagues in your field, and teaching and learning centers at your institution for revisions

Conclusion
14. Facilitating Research at Primarily Undergraduate Institutions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call