Abstract

BackgroundA commitment to Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems now constitutes a core part of many governments’ healthcare reform strategies. The resulting politically-initiated large-scale or national EHR endeavors are challenging because of their ambitious agendas of change, the scale of resources needed to make them work, the (relatively) short timescales set, and the large number of stakeholders involved, all of whom pursue somewhat different interests. These initiatives need to be evaluated to establish if they improve care and represent value for money.MethodsCritical reflections on these complexities in the light of experience of undertaking the first national, longitudinal, and sociotechnical evaluation of the implementation and adoption of England’s National Health Service’s Care Records Service (NHS CRS).Results/discussionWe advance two key arguments. First, national programs for EHR implementations are likely to take place in the shifting sands of evolving sociopolitical and sociotechnical and contexts, which are likely to shape them in significant ways. This poses challenges to conventional evaluation approaches which draw on a model of baseline operations → intervention → changed operations (outcome). Second, evaluation of such programs must account for this changing context by adapting to it. This requires careful and creative choice of ontological, epistemological and methodological assumptions.SummaryNew and significant challenges are faced in evaluating national EHR implementation endeavors. Based on experiences from this national evaluation of the implementation and adoption of the NHS CRS in England, we argue for an approach to these evaluations which moves away from seeing EHR systems as Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) projects requiring an essentially outcome-centred assessment towards a more interpretive approach that reflects the situated and evolving nature of EHR seen within multiple specific settings and reflecting a constantly changing milieu of policies, strategies and software, with constant interactions across such boundaries.

Highlights

  • A commitment to Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems constitutes a core part of many governments’ healthcare reform strategies

  • Based on experiences from this national evaluation of the implementation and adoption of the National Health Service (NHS) Care Records Service (NHS CRS) in England, we argue for an approach to these evaluations which moves away from seeing EHR systems as Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) projects requiring an essentially outcome-centred assessment towards a more interpretive approach that reflects the situated and evolving nature of EHR seen within multiple specific settings and reflecting a constantly changing milieu of policies, strategies and software, with constant interactions across such boundaries

  • Background to the English EHR initiative: the NHS CRS Much has and will be written about the England’s National Programme for Information Technology (NPfIT), the government agency delivering it, NHS Connecting for Health (NHS CFH) and the EHR element at its centre: the NHS Care Records Service (NHS CRS)

Read more

Summary

Methods

Critical reflections on these complexities in the light of experience of undertaking the first national, longitudinal, and sociotechnical evaluation of the implementation and adoption of England’s National Health Service’s Care Records Service (NHS CRS). National programs for EHR implementations are likely to take place in the shifting sands of evolving sociopolitical and sociotechnical and contexts, which are likely to shape them in significant ways. This poses challenges to conventional evaluation approaches which draw on a model of baseline operations ! Evaluation of such programs must account for this changing context by adapting to it This requires careful and creative choice of ontological, epistemological and methodological assumptions.

Background
23. Coiera E
31. Coiera E
34. National Audit Office: The National Programme for IT in the NHS
50. Department of Health: Liberating the NHS
53. Latour B: Reassembling the Social
58. Berg M
63. Baum F
70. Wallerstein N
75. Brender J
79. Orlikowski WJ
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call