Abstract

Superconducting circuits for quantum information processing are often described theoretically in terms of a discrete charge, or equivalently, a compact phase/flux, at each node in the circuit. Here we revisit the consequences of lifting this assumption for transmon and Cooper-pair-box circuits, which are constituted from a Josephson junction and a capacitor, treating both the superconducting phase and charge as noncompact variables. The periodic Josephson potential gives rise to a Bloch band structure, characterised by the Bloch quasicharge. We analyse the possibility of creating superpositions of different quasicharge states by transiently shunting inductive elements across the circuit, and suggest a choice of eigenstates in the lowest Bloch band of the spectrum that may support an inherently robust qubit encoding.

Highlights

  • In 1985, Likharev and Zorin [1] addressed the question of whether the superconducting phase at a circuit node, φ = 2π / 0, is a compact variable, φ ∈

  • We revisit the consequences of lifting this assumption for transmon and Cooper-pair box circuits, which are constituted from a Josephson junction and a capacitor, treating both the superconducting phase and charge as noncompact variables

  • We review a convenient basis proposed by Zak [8], and use this to reanalyze the circuit for a transmon/Cooper-pair box (CPB)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

If the Hamiltonian for the device is invariant under a subset of phase translations (e.g., the 2π -periodic phase-translation symmetry of a Josephson junction), it is reasonably common to identify the phase with that of rotor [2], so that it is compact, and the states |φ φand |φ + 2π φare identical (the subscript φdenotes the phase basis) It follows that the Hilbert space in the charge representation is discrete. The Bloch bands include the pendulum spectrum as a discrete subset, corresponding to the Bloch eigenvalues at the center of the Brillouin zone (i.e., the point, in band-structure nomenclature) It follows that the noncompact periodic system includes the pendulum as a subspace, but its larger Hilbert space admits richer physics.

The modular Zak basis
TRANSIENT SYMMETRY BREAKING
Transiently shunted linear inductor
Transiently shunted 4π-periodic device
DISCUSSION
A possible qubit encoding
Comparisons with the 0-π qubit
Findings
Experimental considerations
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.