Brutalism Now: Rethinking Brutalism in Contemporary World Architecture

Abstract

first_page settings Order Article Reprints Font Type: Arial Georgia Verdana Font Size: Aa Aa Aa Line Spacing:    Column Width:    Background: Open AccessEditorial Brutalism Now: Rethinking Brutalism in Contemporary World Architecture by Didem Akyol Altun Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Tınaztepe Campus, Dogus Street, 35160, Buca-Izmir-Turkey Arts 2016, 5(2), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts5020003 Received: 13 May 2016 / Revised: 18 May 2016 / Accepted: 18 May 2016 / Published: 1 June 2016 (This article belongs to the Special Issue Brutalism Now: Rethinking Brutalism in Contemporary World Architecture) Download Download PDF Download PDF with Cover Download XML Download Epub Versions Notes Brutalism has a privileged role in the history of modern architecture. After World War II, when the discussion of modernism began, Brutalism might have been the first tendency that criticized modern architecture and discussed its positive and negative aspects. In the literature on the history of architecture, two “Brutalisms” have been mentioned. One of these paths was that of Le Corbusier and his buildings, especially those produced after 1950; the other was the Brutalism of those following Smithson, who shaped their ideas in an intellectual area, with the name of “New Brutalism”, more than that of the built environment. However, in both, the common traits were the expression of the structure, materials, and functions of a building, and also the use of materials in their natural, “rough” appearance and for their unpretentious honesty. Using raw material—especially raw concrete (beton brut)—also suggested an ethical implication for brutalists: staring at reality without any veils, purified from all ornaments, and observing the naked and uncontaminated beauty of naturality. The Brutalist movement flourished from the 1950s to the mid-1970s and expanded into local architecture all over the world. The Brutalist effects on architectural products are not only observed in the use of raw concrete, but also in its structural expressionism, using different materials in their pure and natural state, fragmental mass conception in contrast with the huge, monoblock prisms of the International Style, and also in searching for the patterns in old, urban areas. Hence, Brutalism was shaped into delighting forms and, in the hands of talented architects in different localities, many competent Brutalist samples were produced. Although it is generally accepted that Brutalism largely fell into disuse by the 1980s, it has experienced an “updating” of sorts in recent years. Many of the Brutalist aspects have been observed in newer buildings all over the world, with concrete façades, pre-cast elements, using raw materials, and structural expressionism. Accordingly, this Special Issue is aimed at critically analyzing Brutalism again, in all its forms, and to scrutinize the newer Brutalist tendencies throughout the world. Of special interest is a focus on local experiences in Eastern and Asian countries.Topics of primary interest include, but are not limited to: Theoretical frame of Brutalism and its historyBrutalist examples in history of architecture Local examples of Brutalism, especially in Eastern and Asian countriesWe look forward to receiving your submission. Conflicts of InterestThe author declares no conflicts of interest. © 2016 by the author; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Share and Cite MDPI and ACS Style Altun, D.A. Brutalism Now: Rethinking Brutalism in Contemporary World Architecture. Arts 2016, 5, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts5020003 AMA Style Altun DA. Brutalism Now: Rethinking Brutalism in Contemporary World Architecture. Arts. 2016; 5(2):3. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts5020003 Chicago/Turabian Style Altun, Didem Akyol. 2016. "Brutalism Now: Rethinking Brutalism in Contemporary World Architecture" Arts 5, no. 2: 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts5020003 Find Other Styles Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here. Article Metrics No No Article Access Statistics Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.