Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of Brownfield sites in Craiova City. The brownfield sites are of primary importance because they do not only influence the natural environment but also have socio-economic influences on the city in broad meaning: problems in attracting investors, decreasing the attractiveness of real estate properties, the increased rate of unemployment or the consumption of greenfields. Despite this, there is a lack or insufficient information among the decision makers. The general urban plan of Craiova City does not identify the existence of any brownfield site. Moreover, the official planning papers developed by the local authorities (such as The Local Development Strategy and the Integrated Plan for Urban Development) make no references to the brownfield sites. In this respect, the first part of the papers addresses the concept of brownfield and also identifies and maps the types of brownfields in Craiova. Based on specific and relevant case studies, the second part is critically examining the evolution patterns of the brownfield sites within the last decades. Specific management solutions for the reuse and redevelopment of the brownfield sites are also put forward. The paper addresses primarily the and use planners, in order to provide them with a better understanding of what brownfield site are, their nature, scale and patterns.
Highlights
The research areas of spatial planning and in particular those related to urban planning in the USA and UK have recurrently come to use the term of brownfield in an attempt to describe a certain territorial reality
Influenced by the studies undertaken by Alker, both CABERNET and CLARINET have adopted the same definition, considering that brownfield means a site which: has been affected by its previous use (e.g.: industrial area, harbour area), is currently abandoned, has real or supposed contamination problems, it usually is located within urban areas and requires interventions to be reintroduced in the economic circuit (CLARINET, 2007) doi:10.5719/hgeo.2012.61.91
The brownfield sites are not conceptualized though; the research is mainly conducted from a qualitative point of view of the industrial landscape that has bee generated as a result of the deindustrialization
Summary
The research areas of spatial planning and in particular those related to urban planning in the USA and UK have recurrently come to use the term of brownfield in an attempt to describe a certain territorial reality. Influenced by the studies undertaken by Alker, both CABERNET and CLARINET have adopted the same definition, considering that brownfield means a site which: has been affected by its previous use (e.g.: industrial area, harbour area), is currently abandoned, has real or supposed contamination problems, it usually is located within urban areas and requires interventions to be reintroduced in the economic circuit (CLARINET , 2007). This definition is very close to what in the UK is referred as previously developed land, namely any land that has been or is occupied by a permanent structure, which currently is abandoned or unoccupied. The brownfield sites are not conceptualized though; the research is mainly conducted from a qualitative point of view of the industrial landscape that has bee generated as a result of the deindustrialization (the so-called obsolete industrial grounds “maidan industrial” as metaphorically named by Chelcea, 2008)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have