Brood rearing costs affect future reproduction in the precocial common goldeneye Bucephala clangula

Abstract

Life‐history theory assumes a trade‐off between current reproductive effort and future reproductive success. There are a large number of studies demonstrating reproductive trade‐offs in different animal taxa, particularly in birds. Most bird studies have focused on the costs of chick rearing in altricial species. These costs have been assumed to be low in precocial species, but this aspect has been little studied. We used long‐term individual reproductive data from the common goldeneye Bucephala clangula, an iteroparous precocial duck with uniparental female care, to examine whether brood rearing carries costs that affect future reproductive performance. All females were experienced breeders, and possible differences in female quality were ruled out. We compared within‐individual (between‐year) changes in clutch size, hatching date and body mass between females that had reared a brood in the previous year and females that had not. It turned out that brood rearing involved a cost in terms of clutch size and hatching date the next year, but not in terms of body mass: females that had reared a brood in the previous year laid relatively smaller clutches and laid relatively later than females that had not reared a brood. Our results show that normal brood rearing in a precocial species involves costs that affect future reproduction.