Bronchial hyper-responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Abstract

Several lung diseases including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) involve chronic inflammation of the airways. Therefore, there is great interest in non-invasive methods assessing airway inflammation. Measurement of bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) and exhaled nitric oxide (NO) are such indirect markers of airway inflammation. Additional information about severity of disease, prognosis and possible response to anti-inflammatory treatment with inhaled corticosteroids can be gained by these methods. However, they are not yet established in assessing patients with COPD in clinical routine. BHR has long been recognised as a hallmark of asthma. Less is known about prevalence and clinical relevance of BHR in the general population and in COPD patients. Longitudinal studies have shown that BHR in healthy persons is a risk factor for development of respiratory symptoms, asthma and COPD. BHR has also been shown to increase the detrimental effect of cigarette smoke and is associated with a decline in lung function. Furthermore, studies indicate that the presence of BHR is a prognostic factor in COPD. Increased BHR to histamine has been shown to be a predictor for mortality in COPD patients. Based on current guidelines, treatment of patients with severe COPD (GOLD stage III and IV) and regular exacerbations includes therapy with inhaled corticosteroids. Inhaled corticosteroids have been shown to reduce frequency of exacerbations but they have not been shown to modify long-term decline in FEV1. However, one small study found that BHR to inhaled mannitol could possibly predict responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with moderately severe COPD and identify a subgroup of patients that is likely to benefit from this treatment. Exhaled NO has been shown to correlate with other inflammatory markers and to be elevated in asthma. In COPD patients, data is inconsistent. However, measuring exhaled NO may have a role in the identification of patients with severe, unstable COPD who were shown to have higher NO levels compared to patients with stable COPD. This suggests that exhaled NO might be a method to assess and monitor disease activity in COPD. Possible explanations for the contradictory results are different measurement techniques of exhaled NO and different smoking histories of patients in various studies. Smoking has been found to be a confounding factor by reducing NO levels significantly, an effect which might counteract the potentially increased exhaled NO due to airway inflammation. In conclusion, measuring BHR and exhaled NO in patients with COPD might provide additional information about disease severity, prognosis and possible response to anti-inflammatory medical treatment. However, to establish these methods in clinical routine in COPD patients, more data is clearly needed.