Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article explores the dynamics of brokerage at the intersection between the justice conceptions enshrined in global norms and the notions of justice asserted in specific socio-environmental struggles. Using the case of a small hydropower project in Nepal, we trace the attempts of an indigenous activist to enrol villagers in his campaign against the background of villagers’ everyday negotiations with the hydropower company. The study shows how global norms, such as indigenous peoples’ rights, may fail to gain traction on the ground or even become sources of injustice in particular contexts.

Highlights

  • The local chairman of the Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities (NEFIN) has a point: the one meeting held by the project developer with villagers eight years ago does not meet the requirements of the indigenous peoples’ rights to consultation set out in International Labour Organisation Convention 169 (ILO 169), ratified by Nepal’s government

  • Shyam encounters a more general issue with regard to the linkages between global indigenous rights and socio-environmental struggles in specific sites: the conceptions of justice enshrined in global norms may be different from people’s notions on the ground (Upton 2014; Sikor and Hoang 2016)

  • Shyam finds himself caught in the middle: between the distributive conceptions dominant on the ground and in national policy, on the one hand, and the emphasis on recognition in mobilisations and global norms on indigenous peoples’ rights, on the other (Doran 2017))

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Shyam is having a hard time convincing the villagers of Bargachhi to support his campaign directed at a small hydropower project.1 The local chairman of the Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities (NEFIN) has a point: the one meeting held by the project developer with villagers eight years ago does not meet the requirements of the indigenous peoples’ rights to consultation set out in International Labour Organisation Convention 169 (ILO 169), ratified by Nepal’s government. Following a brief introduction to the study site, we analyse everyday negotiations over project impacts and benefits to demonstrate how villagers and company institutionalised a particular, distributive notion of justice in line with Nepal’s hydropower policy.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.