Abstract

Abstract Radiative transfer calculations for a one-dimensional column model of the atmosphere containing a plane-parallel, homogeneous cloud are used to show that the common procedure of assuming that fields of view for high resolution satellite imagers are either overcast or cloud-free will lead to biases in the infrared albedo and surface insulation for typical (250 km)2 weekly to monthly mean climate scales. The biases arise because cloud fields on the (1–8 km)2 scale typical of satellite imager resolution are often broken rather than overcast and because the anisotropy of the radiance held for overcast regions differs from that for cloud-flee regions. Furthermore, the anisotropy for overcast regions is a nonlinear function of cloud optical depth; consequently, there is no equivalent overcast system that will reproduce the anisotropy of the radiance field reflected by broken clouds. The results of the calculations indicate that the biases are a function of the sun-earth-satellite viewing geometry. For ...

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.